Monday, March 7, 2011

Today's Tweets

What I had to say

Conversations I participated in

What I found interesting or amusing

0 comments:

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Today's Tweets

What I had to say

  • It amuses me that the Internet has named the super-annoying trends bar for the new Twitter iPhone app: #dickbar [12:27 PM]
  • #flteach question: I'm a self-teaching S. Read a kid's book, got gist. Now what? Re-read? Exercises? (Like what?) Summarize? New book? Help! [ 3:24 PM]
  • I'd forgotten how great DDR is as exercise. High aerobic activity == lots of calories burned. Fun == lots of time at it. Double win! [ 5:31 PM]

What I found interesting or amusing

0 comments:

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Today's Tweets

What I had to say

  • Ich hab' mit anderen Deutsche Leute gestern gesprochen! Ich kann nicht so gut sprechen, aber die Übungen sind gut. #de #deutschlernen [ 2:48 PM]
  • Plan for today: unpack boxes. Lots of boxes. #omgsomanyboxes http://t.co/Fb4eToc [ 2:50 PM]
  • The cats, on the other hand, like all the boxes: great for stalking and slinking and other cat-appropriate activities. [ 5:08 PM]

0 comments:

Friday, March 4, 2011

Today's Tweets

What I had to say

Conversations I participated in

What I found interesting or amusing

  • Fate of Yahoo's startup acquisitions: "integration obstacles, endless meetings, and stifling bureaucracy" http://goo.gl/iyMXF via STS [11:42 AM]

0 comments:

Tweet Posts: Good or Bad?

I started my automatic tweet round-up posts for two reasons: 1) to have all my info backed up and in one place, and 2) to let my older ;) friends in on my internet-doings (some of them read my blog but don't have and don't want Twitter accounts).

But I dislike how the "Today's Tweets" blog post title is spamming the list of recent posts. And it is duplicated info for my friends who do have Twitter accounts. And I will probably make my own "me on the web" consolidation page that I'll have full control over.

So what do you guys think? Do you like the new Twitter posts? Or do you think they're spammy and should die a big, horrible death?

1 comments:

Memorizing Info about German Words

Learning yesterday about the existence of German single-object transitive verbs that take the dative case, rather than accusative, forced me to update my flashcards to add a note to these “exceptional” verbs.

There are apparently several things about German words that just have to be memorized:

  • verbs:
    • accusative or dative case (for its direct object)
    • weak, irregular, or strong (for simple past tense and past participle)
    • stem-changing
  • nouns:
    • masculine, feminine, or neuter gender
    • plural form
    • genitive form

I’m sure there are more things that need to be memorized, but I haven’t been exposed to them yet. :P

0 comments:

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Today's Tweets

What I had to say

Conversations I participated in

  • @limacohen said: Y gracias al tío Steve también aprendí una nueva palabra "flummoxed": confused, perplexed, flustered [ 8:41 AM]
  • @I said: @limacohen déte cuenta de que es una palabra incomún. La entiendo, pero como una hablante nativa de inglés, nunca la uso. #es [12:49 PM]
  • @ecormany said: bloody hell. PROTIP: don't use the phrase "business model" in your tweets unless you want to play tower defense against spambots. [ 2:40 PM]
  • @I said: @ecormany Someone should make a web game that is a front-end for deleting spam-tweets, à la Typing of the Dead or psDoom! #excellentidea [ 3:00 PM]

What I found interesting or amusing

0 comments:

German Accusative vs Dative Case

If you don't care about German grammar, skip this post. :P

Yesterday, I had a conversation with @DoubleTranslate* on Twitter about their German exercises involving accusative vs dative case. It turns out that languages have exceptions; who knew?? ;)

I had learned in school that when a transitive verb has just a direct object, that object was always marked in the accusative case: "I see him." And if a transitive verb had two objects (a direct and an indirect object), then the former was accusative and the latter dative: "I gave him the book" or I gave the book to him." Wikipedia agrees: "In Latin and many other languages, the direct object is marked by the accusative case, while the indirect object is typically marked by the dative case."

However, it does not seem to be that simple, at least in German. (You saw that weasel-word "typically" above, right?) Wikipedia also says, "The dative is generally used to mark the indirect object of a German sentence. ... Some German verbs require the dative for their direct objects. Common examples include folgen, helfen and antworten."

So it looks like my understanding of accusative/dative for direct/indirect objects is correct generally, but in German there are significant exceptions. I suspect that these exceptional verbs that require their direct object to take the dative will have to memorized, just like whether a verb is strong or stem-changing must be memorizing for each individual verb. There are even lists for this.

@DoubleTranslate's weekday exercises are really great for German beginners to get some practice in. I highly recommend following them, especially if you're self-taught and don't otherwise have homework assignments.

1 comments:

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Today's Tweets

What I had to say

  • Taking a one-semester-in-a-day accelerated Python class. Zoooooom! [10:07 AM]
  • CA DMV, I did *not* miss you. Stand in line to take a number to stand in line. :( [ 4:05 PM]
  • A free 5-week "reverse engineering" sci-fi/fantasy writing workshop? Sweet!! http://bit.ly/e5ZUTY [ 6:48 PM]

Conversations I participated in

0 comments:

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Today's Tweets

What I had to say

Conversations I participated in

0 comments: